fredag 28. februar 2014

WoGE #427

It's my turn again, and as usual I struggle to find something that is bothe hard enough to find and interesting enough geologically speaking. Which means I should be able to find out something about the geology myself, preferrably without resorting to at-work literature searches: If you need a subscription to read about the geology, it's unfair.

Matthew's mysterious table mountain took a while to find. I searched in all the wrong places first, and finally found it in another "wrong place". A geological map showed what it is, but really opened more new questions as to why it is where it is. Maybe I should go have a look at it in person?

One thing that I'm reasonably certain of, is that it's not an "outlier".

This one IS an outlier. I don't think it will be hard to find, and it's well documented so Schott's rule is in effect.



For any new players to Where on (Google) Earth, simply post a comment with latitude and longitude and write something about the (geologic/geographic/hydrographic) feature in the picture. If you win, you get to host the next one. Previous WoGEs are collected by Felix on his blog and a KML file.

If you don't know what the Schott Rule is, it doesn't apply to you.

Good hunting!

11 kommentarer:

  1. I "was" here yesterday when searching for Matthew's #426 ...

    44º39N 5º07E, the Saou syncline, near Drôme, France.

    That's a limestone syncline (about 2 km wide and 14 km long; the highest point is 1500 meters approx.)

    At my first searches I didn't found anything about the geology, but, after lunch, I'll search deeper!

    By the way, my first impression - and that's why it remained in my mind -it looked like a neural tube! :)

    SvarSlett
    Svar
    1. Luis, if you use another name which is associated with that structure, a google search takes you to a very good site with lots of information about the French Alps and good details about this structure. It's in French, but the figures are very good.

      Slett
    2. First of all, I don´t take 2 days to lunch ;) I was out for the weekend ...

      Second, I've noticed that I broke the Schott rule - the first thing I usually do, is look at the picture (and then the text) and, as I immediately recognized it, I was thrilled and did not realize the rule. What do you/we do now?

      Third: Ole, is the other name "Trois Becs"? Because my French is very poor (just a little and was a looooong time ago) and I do not trust google translate enough for a scientific discussion, I just give a few info (french source):
      - is a promontory, well detached from the Valentinois plains;
      - beside the main syncline it has a set of syncline/anticline (which is part of a larger set of synclines and anticlines in the massif of Diois);
      - consists of Cretaceous (Cenomanian and Turonian) limestones.

      On the biological side, there's an amazing biodiversity in this "Forêt de Saou"!

      Slett
    3. My French is also rudimentary, but a little knowledge of structural geology and sedimentology make this fairly easy to read. The site is bookmarked as a good source on the geology of the French Alps!

      As to the violation of the Schott rule, I don't really know what to do. But I think you now have the responsibilty of finding a new WoGE anyway!

      Slett
    4. Should we wait for Ron, Felix or one of the game's Precambrian?

      Slett
  2. That's the Schott Rule, not Shott Rule.

    SvarSlett
  3. Of course Ron - I have fixed my typo now.

    SvarSlett
  4. Gentlemen, the host of a game decides what to do. Ole said Luis should continue, so Luis has to go on. One hour more or less does not make a difference.

    SvarSlett
  5. Ok, for now on, I'll be extra-alert for the Schott rule - I'm not used to be a WoGE-winner so, I never thought of the rule as applicable to me, my bad!

    So, the game must go on - by 2014-03-03/12:00:00 (WET) a new WoGE should be up! :)

    SvarSlett